Event 2
![]() |
| Ticket from Event |
The artists all expressed their own perspectives on the topic through multimedia art. There were poems, visual art, animations, short films, and music. Artist Jay Duffer created a choreography on the concept of salt.
![]() |
Salt by Jay Duffer (Taken from the Event) |
Artist Jonathan Fielding and Brenda Withers’ “Spec-Ulation” took an interactive approach to the concept of glasses. They interviewed several people about their experience with wearing glasses and shared the stories behind their glasses and their memories associated with them.
![]() | |
Spec-Ulation by Fielding and Withers
|
A piece that stood out to me most was one by Ruben Carrazana, titled “What’s in the Box.” He showed video clips of multiple characters opening different types of boxes, such as an engagement ring container, a picnic basket, a backpack, and a box of flour.
![]() | |
What's in the Box by Ruben Carrazana
|
The event made me realize that so many things are taken for granted in our day-to-day lives, however, these little things and moments can inspire so much joy and gratitude. In the current state of the world, with our technological platforms often leading us to feelings of isolation and emptiness, the theme emphasized the importance of rediscovering the beauty of ordinary things and ordinary tasks.
This event made me think back to Walter Benjamin’s concept of “aura.” It is an example of how mechanical reproduction of art enhances the uniqueness and aura in art (Davis), rather than destroying it. Although I initially agreed with the sentiment that technology removes the authenticity of art, it can be used as a tool to remind ourselves of what truly matters to us (whether that be appreciating the value in the ordinary, raising awareness for sociocultural issues, or better understanding a topic that we’re passionate about). The rapid growth of technology has provided us with a promising third culture with a wide array of new ways of expression and communication (Kelly).
Benjamin notes that “even the most perfect reproduction of a work of art is lacking in one element: its presence in time and space, its unique existence at the place where it happens to be” (Benjamin). If these art pieces successfully reminds us of the ordinary things surrounding us that we often overlooked, is it truly lacking presence at that moment?
Perhaps the loss of aura isn’t an absolute negative consequence of industrialized society. Rather, art can serve at the forefront of helping us understand how the world shifts over time (Vesna).
References
Benjamin, Walter. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. London: Penguin, 2008. Print.
Carrazana, Ruben. "What's in the Box." Digital Image. Odes for a World in Search of Joy. 1 May. 2021.
David, S. “Ode to Common Things.” Medium. August 29. 2020. Web.
Davis, Douglas. “The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Reproduction.” The MIT Press, 1995. Web. 19 Oct. 2012.
Duffer, Jay. "Salt." Digital Image. Odes for a World in Search of Joy. 1 May. 2021.
Fielding, Jonathan. Withers, Brenda. "Spec-Ulation." Digital Image. Odes for a World in Search of Joy. 1 May. 2021.
Kelly, Kevin. "The Third Culture" Science 13 February 1998: Vol. 279 no. 5353 pp. 992-993. Web.
Vesna, Victoria. “Medicine pt1.” MedTech + Art. 22 April. 2012. Lecture.




Comments
Post a Comment